Provenance
(Galerie E. Blot, Paris), in 1912. Mrs. Julius Schmits, née Ida Haarhous [1861-1954], Elberfeld [later Wuppertal], before 1925.[1] Daniel L. Wildenstein [d. 2001], New York; gift 1969 to NGA.
[1] The early provenance given in J.-B. de la Faille, _The Works of Vincent van Gogh: Paintings and Drawings_, Amsterdam, 1970: F442, under "Rejected Works" as _The Small Garden_ includes the Berlin dealer Otto Wacker. However, according to Koldehoff, Stefan. "The Wacker Forgeries: a catalogue," _The Van Gogh Museum Journal_, 2002:139+, repro., this is unlikely. A stamp on the reverse of the painting has the name "Julius Schmits" followed by two words that are difficult to read, probably "Elberfeld" and possibly "Wuperfiel" or "Wuppertal." When Mrs. Schmits collection was auctioned in 1925 this painting was no longer included.
Accession Number
1969.14.1
Medium
oil on canvas
Dimensions
overall: 46 x 38 cm (18 1/8 x 14 15/16 in.) | framed: 59.7 x 52 x 7.6 cm (23 1/2 x 20 1/2 x 3 in.)
Classification
Painting
Credit Line
Gift of Daniel Wildenstein
Tags
Painting Early Modern (1901–1950) Oil Painting Canvas
Background & Context
Background Story
Landscape is a painting by an imitator of Vincent van Gogh, dating to approximately 1925-1928. The designation "imitator" rather than "copyist" or "forger" suggests an artist who consciously worked in Van Gogh's distinctive style rather than one who attempted to pass off the work as an original. This places the painting within the complex history of Van Gogh's posthumous influence, which had reached extraordinary proportions by the mid-1920s. Vincent van Gogh (1853-1890) died in obscurity, having sold virtually no paintings during his lifetime. Yet within three decades of his death, he had become the most famous artist in the world, a transformation driven by the publication of his letters, the growing recognition of his work by critics and collectors, and the identification of his art with the romantic myth of the tortured genius. By the 1920s, Van Gogh's style—the swirling brushwork, the bold, unmixed colors, the emotional intensity—had become one of the most recognizable artistic signatures in Western art. This recognition spawned a diverse range of imitations, from sincere homages by artists who found in Van Gogh a liberating model for expressive painting, to deliberate forgeries designed to exploit the booming market for his work. The period 1925-1928 was particularly significant in the history of Van Gogh reception. Major exhibitions were bringing his work to wider audiences, prices for genuine Van Goghs were rising dramatically, and the Van Gogh myth was being solidified in popular culture through books, plays, and journalistic accounts. An imitator working in this period would have been responding to an artistic personality that had achieved almost mythic status, and the resulting landscape would reflect not just Van Gogh's style but the cultural moment that had made that style so potent and so widely recognized. The landscape subject itself is characteristic, as landscape was the genre in which Van Gogh made his most revolutionary contributions, transforming it from a backdrop into a vehicle for psychological and emotional expression.
Cultural Impact
Van Gogh's posthumous influence transformed landscape painting across the Western world, encouraging artists to treat the natural world as a vehicle for subjective expression rather than objective description. The phenomenon of Van Gogh imitation, while sometimes problematic for connoisseurs and collectors, testifies to the extraordinary reach of his artistic vision and the way his style became a universal visual language for emotional landscape painting.
Why It Matters
This painting matters as a document of the Van Gogh phenomenon and its impact on early twentieth-century art, illustrating how the rediscovered master's style had by the 1920s become a recognizable visual language that artists could adopt, adapt, and imitate in their own search for expressive means.