Brushstroke with Spatter

Description

Roy Lichtenstein rose to prominence at the beginning of the 1960s and became one of the best-known practitioners of Pop Art. His brightly painted canvases depicting everyday objects, as well as scenes of war and romance culled from the pages of contemporary comics, were rendered in stylized black outlines and hand-painted Ben Day dots that mimicked the commercial printing process. Thus he seemed to elevate what was often seen as low art—both its quotidian, affective subject matter and its visual terms—into high art. This was never simply a straightforward process of reversal, however, and by mid-decade Lichtenstein began to focus on subjects that reflected his lifelong interest in art historical themes.

Brushstroke with Spatter, from the Brushstroke series (1965–67), is a wry commentary on the bravura of midcentury Abstract Expressionism. Here Lichtenstein combines the gestural sweep of Willem de Kooning’s brushwork with the rhythmic drips typical of Jackson Pollock. He isolates and magnifies his stroke and spatter against a ground of Ben Day dots, reproducing the conventionally painterly elements as flatly as possible with no trace of emotion or texture. This deadpan rendering is not purely comic, but also establishes a tension key to the work’s success as an abstract painting in its own right, with grand scalar play and dramatic cropping, intensity of color, and the optical pulse of the dotted ground.

Brushstroke with Spatter

Roy Lichtenstein

1966

Accession Number

24836

Medium

Oil and Magna on canvas

Dimensions

172.7 × 203.2 cm (68 × 80 in.)

Classification

Painting

Museum

The Art Institute of Chicago

Chicago, United States

Credit Line

Barbara Neff Smith and Solomon Byron Smith Purchase Fund

Background & Context

Background Story

"Brushstroke with Spatter" is one of the most provocative works in Lichtenstein's oeuvre, a 1966 canvas that takes the gestural mark of Abstract Expressionism—the heroic, spontaneous brushstroke—and reproduces it as a flat, mechanical image using the commercial techniques of advertising illustration. The composition is disarmingly simple: a single sweeping brushstroke rendered in yellow and black, accompanied by the drips and splatters that in Abstract Expressionist painting signified emotional authenticity and existential freedom. By transferring these markers of subjective expression to the impersonal language of Ben-Day dots and hard-edge outlining, Lichtenstein performed a kind of patricide on his immediate predecessors, exposing the brushstroke as a reproducible sign rather than a trace of individual genius. The irony is complex: Lichtenstein's own brushwork in executing this parody had to be technically proficient, requiring the same hand-eye coordination that he was simultaneously denying. The "spatter" effect was achieved by screen-printing techniques rather than spontaneous dripping, making the randomness of Pollock's method into a calculated design element. The painting influenced the development of Conceptual Art by suggesting that the meaning of an image depended on its context and technique rather than its maker's intention. It also belongs to Lichtenstein's broader critique of originality in the 1960s: if a brushstroke could be mechanically reproduced without losing its identity, then the Romantic mythology of the artist as unique creator was fundamentally compromised.

Cultural Impact

This canvas performed Conceptual patricide on Abstract Expressionism, transforming the spontaneous brushstroke into a mechanical sign and undermining the Romantic mythology of artistic originality.

Why It Matters

It matters because Lichtenstein painted a fake brushstroke that took as much skill as a real one—proving that parody can be as difficult as sincerity.