Carnival

Description

According to Jim Jordan, this drawing was "undoubtly the inspiration" for the painting known as Virginia Landscape, also of 1943 (fig. 2; Jordan and Goldwater 1982, pp. 82-83). It belongs to a moment when, staying on his in-laws' farm in Virginia in 1943, Gorky turned to nature and nature's creative forces as a point of reference. André Breton's 1945 celebration of Gorky contains a still-timely warning, however, against making too literal a reading o a landscape in his work:

"Those who love easy solutions will find slim pickings here: despite all warnings, they will continue in their attempts to discover still lifes, landscapes, and figurations in these compositions, simply because they do not have the courage to recognize the fact that all human emotions tend to be precipitated in hybird forms. By "hybird" I mean to signify the end result produced by the contemplation of a natural spectacle blended with the flux of childhood and other memories provoked by intense concentration upon this spectacle by an observer endowed with quite exceptional emotional gifts. It should, indeed, be emphasized that Gorky is unique among Surrealists painters in remaining in direct contact with nature by standing in front of it in order to paint. He is not concerned, however, with translating nature as an end in itself, but rather with extrating from its sensations capable of acting as springboards towards the deepening, in terms of consciousness as much as of enjoyment, of certain spiritual states." (André Breton, "Arshile Gorky," in Surrealism and Painting, tr. by Simon Watson Taylor, New York, 1972, p. 200)

Gorky's interst in Joan Miró is apparent here, though it would not be easy to pin down specific sources for Carnival. Willem de Kooning recalled that Gorky expressed admiration for Miró's Still Life with Old Shoe (1937, New York, The Museum of Modern Art; New York, The Museum of Modern Art, Joan Miró. 1993-94, exh. cat. by Carolyn Lanchner, no. 145, ill.), which was shown by Pierre Matisse in the late 1930s (Jordan and Goldwater 1982 p. 75). Like many works by Gorky, Carnival is a composite of memories, experiences, and associations—both personal and artistic—powered by the tension between precisely outlined bud- and bodylike forms, and free, gestural passages. As Diane Waldman has written, Gorky could be described as "the last Surrealist and the first Abstract Expressionist" (New York 1981-82, p. 60)

— Entry, Dawn Ades, Surrealist Art: The Lindy and Edwin Bergman Collection at the Art Institute of Chicago, 1997, p. 142-143.

Provenance

Sold by Julien Levy, Bridgewater, Conn., to Lindy and Edwin Bergman, Chicago, 1961; given to the Art Institute of Chicago, 1999.

Carnival

Arshile Gorky

1943

Accession Number

118697

Medium

Crayon with graphite and scraping on off-white wove paper

Dimensions

57.8 × 73.2 cm (22 13/16 × 28 7/8 in.)

Classification

crayon

Museum

The Art Institute of Chicago

Chicago, United States

Credit Line

Gift of Lindy Bergman (The Lindy and Edwin Bergman Collection)

Background & Context

Background Story

"Carnival" is a 1943 crayon drawing with graphite and scraping by Arshile Gorky that captures the Armenian-American artist at a crucial transitional moment, the image showing the biomorphic forms and fluid lines that would lead from the artist's early study of the European masters to the fully personal style of his mature Abstract Expressionist paintings. The composition is a field of organic shapes that suggest both festive figures and abstract gestures, the crayon creating a surface of extraordinary richness and texture that suggests both the physical materiality of the medium and the psychological depth of the artist's imagination. The scraping technique creates highlights and textures that add a sense of movement and energy to the image, the physical violence of the scraping suggesting both the festive chaos of the carnival and the emotional turbulence of the artist's inner life. The 1943 date places this work in the period of Gorky's increasing freedom from his early influences, the drawings serving as a laboratory for the forms and gestures that would appear in the great paintings of the late 1940s. Art historians have connected this drawing to the broader tradition of the carnival or festival image in modern art, from the harlequins of Picasso to the circus subjects of Chagall, noting that Gorky's treatment is more abstract, more focused on the internal emotional resonance of the theme than the social observation or the narrative content of these predecessors. The work also demonstrates Gorky's mastery of the crayon medium: the combination of fluid line, rich tone, and physical texture creates a surface that rivals the painted works in its complexity and depth.

Cultural Impact

This 1943 crayon drawing made carnival biomorphism emotionally turbulent through scraping-texture movement energy, using off-white paper organic-shape richness to bridge European-master study with mature Abstract Expressionist personal-style laboratory.

Why It Matters

It matters because Gorky drew a carnival and made the crayon feel like it was spinning—proving that even a party could be a storm if the scraping was fierce enough.