Untitled #92

Description

Cindy Sherman is a major figure in the contemporary revival of directed, or staged, photography. Her work explores the pervasive effects that mass-media images have upon the construction, assumption, and projection of individual identities. Since the late 1970s, the artist has served as both photographer and model for a large cast of fictional personalities created through changes in costume, hair (usually a wig), makeup, and lighting. Sherman first gained recognition for a series of black-and-white works that imitate the look and feel of stills from popular films of the 1950s and 1960s. In 1981 she began a series of large color photographs that mimic the horizontal format of a magazine centerfold. Though formally reminiscent of such glossy spreads, Sherman’s representations are fraught with anxiety, vulnerability, and longing. In Untitled #92, she depicted herself in a moment of cinematic distress, crouched on the floor with wet hair. Her costume—white blouse and plaid skirt—evokes a school uniform, and her well-manicured hands offer evidence of some unknown struggle. An imposing darkness surrounds her but a bright light, suggestive of a flashlight or the headlights of a car, illuminates her blank expression.

Untitled #92

Cindy Sherman

1981

Accession Number

229389

Medium

Chromogenic print

Dimensions

61 × 122 cm (24 × 48 in.)

Classification

photograph

Museum

The Art Institute of Chicago

Chicago, United States

Credit Line

Gift of Edlis Neeson Collection

Background & Context

Background Story

"Untitled #92" is a 1981 chromogenic print by Cindy Sherman that serves as a companion to the other works in the "Untitled Film Still" series, the image showing the artist in a different costume, pose, and emotional register that demonstrates the extraordinary range of her self-transformative practice. The composition is another 24 × 48 inch print, the horizontal format suggesting the widescreen cinema of the 1950s and 1960s, the image cropped and composed to mimic the narrative conventions of film while refusing to provide the narrative content that would make the image coherent. The chromogenic print creates the same surface of commercial perfection that characterizes the series, the colors saturated and the tones smooth, the technical excellence serving both to seduce the viewer into the cinematic illusion and to maintain the critical distance that allows the deconstruction to occur. The 1981 date places this work in the same period as "Untitled #86" and the other film stills, suggesting that Sherman was producing these images in rapid succession, each photograph exploring a different aspect of the feminine stereotype and its representational construction. Art historians have compared this series to the star portraits of Hollywood photographers like George Hurrell and the fashion photography of the postwar period, noting that Sherman's treatment is more critical, more focused on the artificiality and the pathos of the constructed image than the celebration or the irony of these other traditions.

Cultural Impact

This 1981 companion chromogenic print expanded self-transformative range through different costume-emotion widescreen cinematic mimicry, using horizontal commercial perfection to both seduce into illusion and maintain critical feminine-stereotype deconstruction distance.

Why It Matters

It matters because Sherman put on another face and made the photograph wonder who was really looking—proving that even a mask could be a mirror if the print was sharp enough.